It's Not What You Think
じゃないよ
じゃないよ
2018
Book
Why do people look at only a part of an object and imagine the whole picture on their own? In this book, we look at a part of an object and think, "It's a straight spoon," when in fact it is a round spoon, or we look at a part of an object and think, "It's an egg," when in fact it is a pallet. I expressed this kind of "gap in perception. I want to shake up the everyday perceptions of people who see my work.
During the process of making this work, I began to think about whether or not there was another object inside the object, based on the fragmented representation of the image. The hole part of the book, like the field of vision one can see, until now we have only seen part of the subjective outline in all things. Perhaps there are many things in this world outside our field of vision. We just can't find them. On the other hand, I would like to discuss the coincidence of the existence of superposition of things that do not contain a separate causal sequence within a thing.
Book
なぜ、人は、物の一部だけを見て勝手に全体像を想像してしまうだろうか。この本では、一部だけを見て、「まっすぐなスプーンだろう」と思ったら、実際は丸い形だったり、一部を見て「卵だろう」と思ったら、実際はパレットだったりし。このような「認識のズレ」を表現した。作品を見た人の日常の当たり前の認識を揺さぶりたい。
作っている途中で、イメージの断片的な表現から、物体の中に別の物体が存在するかどうかを考えるようになった。本の穴部分は、人が見ることができる視野のように、視野の「輪郭」が違うので、見た内容に基づいて定義が異なるのかもしれない。 今まで我々は万物の中に主観的な輪郭の一部しか見なかった。恐らくこの世界には私たちの視野の外に多くのものがある。見つけられないだけだ。主観的な視野によって物事を判断してしまう。 一方で、事柄の中に別に因果系列を含まない事柄が重ねて存在するという偶然性も議論したい。
Why do people look at only a part of an object and imagine the whole picture on their own? In this book, we look at a part of an object and think, "It's a straight spoon," when in fact it is a round spoon, or we look at a part of an object and think, "It's an egg," when in fact it is a pallet. I expressed this kind of "gap in perception. I want to shake up the everyday perceptions of people who see my work.
During the process of making this work, I began to think about whether or not there was another object inside the object, based on the fragmented representation of the image. The hole part of the book, like the field of vision one can see, until now we have only seen part of the subjective outline in all things. Perhaps there are many things in this world outside our field of vision. We just can't find them. On the other hand, I would like to discuss the coincidence of the existence of superposition of things that do not contain a separate causal sequence within a thing.
